000			01695cad a22002055a 4500
001			L147932
008			090702e20090616xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u147932
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aLondon District Properties Management Ltd and others v Goolamy and another _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2009
520			_a[2009] EWHC 1367 (Admin), 16 June 2009. The case relates to rent increase procedure under a statutory periodic tenancy. Mr and Mrs Goolamy (G) had a tenancy agreement which included a rent review clause allowing an annual increase of the rent by 5%. The landlords, London District Properties Management Ltd (L), decided to increase the rent to a much higher level under the Housing Act 1988 S13. The Rent Assessment Committee decided that they had no authority to review the rent as the clause in the tenancy agreement continued under the Housing Act 1988 S5. L appealed to the High Court. "Held": Appeal allowed. S13 mentions two different types of periodic tenancies: statutory periodic tenancies and all other periodic tenancies. S13 should apply with statutory periodic tenancies. The contractual rent increase procedure should apply with the other periodic tenancies. This case dealt with a statutory periodic tenancy, therefore L could take benefit of the Housing Act 1988 S13.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aLONDON DISTRICT PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT LTD V GOOLAMY
650	2	4	_aHOUSING ACT 1988
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-TENANCY RENT REVIEW
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2009/1367.html _zView the case free of charge at www.bailli.org...
942			_n0
999			_c81678 _d81678