000 02171cad a22002175a 4500
001 L148107
008 090728e20090720xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035 _a(Sirsi) u148107
041 0 _aeng
245 0 4 _aThe Cheesecake Shop Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another
_h[electronic resource]
260 _c2009
520 _a[2009] EWHC 1748 (Admin), 20 July 2009. The case relates to the existence of evidence to justify the decision of a planning inspector. Cheesecake Shop Ltd (C) had applied for planning permission for a development to Nottingham City Council (N) which refused it. C's appeal was dismissed by a planning inspector. C applied to quash the decision of this planning inspector and for judicial review of another decision of the same inspector refusing the award of its costs for the planning permission. C's premises were located in a regeneration zone. C had applied to demolish part of these premises and replace it with a two-storey extension. This was refused for two reasons. The proposed development would not form part of a comprehensive redevelopment scheme. It would increase acquisition costs if needed to enter into this redevelopment scheme. C argued against these reasons. "Held": applications granted. The inspector had no evidence that the grant of planning permission would increase the costs of a comprehensive redevelopment. The weight attached to material considerations was insufficient or inadequate. Her decisions in regard to the planning permission and the costs are quashed. N should pay C's costs related to the proceedings.
590 _aKA
650 2 4 _aTHE CHEESECAKE SHOP LTD V SOS FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
650 2 4 _aALNWICK DISTRICT COUNCIL V SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS
650 2 4 _aASHBRIDGE INVESTMENTS LTD V MINISTER OF HOUSING AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
651 4 _aEngland and Wales
_y1543-
690 _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-DEVELOPMENT CONTROL
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2009/1748.html
_zView the case free of charge at www.bailli.org...
942 _n0
999 _c81732
_d81732