000 01600cab a22003495a 4500
001 L148307
008 090901e20090822xxk 000 0 eng d
035 _a(Sirsi) u148307
041 0 _aeng
100 1 _aMalloy, Paddy
245 0 4 _aThe fork in the road
260 _c2009
490 _aEstates Gazette
_v(0933) 22 August 2009, 56-58(3)
520 _aInterpretation of conveyances departs from other written contracts and other types of legal documents in two important respects. This article refers to case law to illustrate why this is so. Admissibility of extrinsic evidence is illustrated by "Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co" 1997 and post "Mannai" cases. Subsequent conduct and actual intention are also considered.
590 _aKA
650 2 4 _aMANNAI INVESTMENT CO LTD V EAGLE STAR LIFE ASSURANCE CO LTD UK
650 2 4 _aINVESTORS COMPENSATION SCHEME LTD V WEST BROMICH BUILDING SOCIETY (NO 1)
650 2 4 _aBANK OF CREDIT AND COMMERCE INTERNATINAL SA (IN LIQUIDATION) V ALI
650 2 4 _aSIRIUS INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE CO (PUBL) V FAI GENERAL INSURANCE LTD
650 2 4 _aFREEGUARD V ROGERS (NO 1)
650 2 4 _aALI V LANE
650 2 4 _aBRADFORD V JAMES
650 2 4 _aPARTRIDGE V LAWRENCE
650 2 4 _aCHADWICK V ABBOTSWOOD PROPERTIES LTD
650 2 4 _aSHREWSBURY V ADAM
650 2 4 _aHAYCOCKS V NEVILLE
650 2 4 _aPIPER V WAKEFORD
650 2 4 _aCHARTBROOK LTD V PERSIMMON HOMES LTD AND ANOTHER
651 4 _aEngland
_y886-
690 _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-COMMERCIAL LEASES
942 _n0
999 _c81780
_d81780