000			01943cad a22002295a 4500
001			L148756
008			091104e20091020xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u148756
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aThomas Gordon Brown v Carlisle City Council and Stobart Air Limited _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2009
520			_a[2009] EWHC 2519 Admin, 16 October 2009. The case relates to works not included in an application for planning permission. Stobart Air Limited (S) applied to Carlisle City Council (C) for planning permission for works but omitted an application for airside works. C considered that no referral to the Secretary of State was necessary as the application fell within article 2(2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Plans and Consultations) (Departures) Direction 1999. Planning permission was granted for the application development. Thomas Gordon Brown (B) sought permission to apply for judicial review of the planning permission. "Held:" application refused. If a section 106 agreement is entered before a planning permission is granted and results in securing the fact that the application accorded with the development plan, there is no need to refer to the Secretary of State. C did not have to justify its reasons for not referring the application to the Secretary of State.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aTHOMAS GORDON BROWN V CARLISLE CITY COUNCIL AND STOBART AIR LIMITED
650	2	4	_aR V SOS TRANSPORT AND ANOTHER EX P CUMMINS
650	2	4	_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (DEVELOPMENT PLANS AND CONSULTATIONS) (DEPARTURES) DIRECTION 1999
650	2	4	_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S106
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-DEVELOPMENT CONTROL-PLANNING APPLICATIONS
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2009/2519.html _zView the case free of charge at www.bailli.org...
942			_n0
999			_c81947 _d81947