000			01385cad a22001935a 4500
001			L148865
008			091117e20090921xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u148865
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aStoll and Others v Wacks Caller (A Firm) _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2009
520			_a[2009] EWHC 2299 (Ch), 21 September 2009. The case relates to the negligence of a solicitor. The appellants (S) bought a property for development. The neighbours sought judicial review proceedings of the planning permission. As a result, the planning permission was quashed. The development did not proceed. S eventually sold the house and lost a considerable amount of money. They sued their solicitor in court, arguing that he should have introduced "a call-in" clause in the sale contract. The solicitor contested that they would still have gone ahead with the purchase. "Held:" claim failed. The solicitor showed negligence. However, because the market was buoyant at the time of the transaction, S would have still continued with the purchase.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aSTOLL AND OTHERS V WACKS CALLER
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2009/2299.html _zView the case free of charge at www.bailli.org...
942			_n0
999			_c81979 _d81979