| 000 | 01042cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS54886 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u12799 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aMinogue, A. | ||
| 245 | _aFour frontal attack | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v261(7936) 12 April 1996, 28-30(3) |
||
| 520 | _aPresents the view of four lawyers on adjudication in the Scheme for Construction Contracts. Each argues that the scheme, intended to bolster the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Bill, is flawed and requires redrafting. Describes the Scheme. | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION BILL | ||
| 650 | _aSCHEME FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-REGULATIONS | ||
| 690 | _aLAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c8203 _d8203 |
||