| 000 | 01335cad a22001935a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | E149610 | ||
| 008 | 100325e20091208xxk v 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u149610 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aClarence House Limited v National Westminster Bank _h[electronic resource] |
| 260 | _c2009 | ||
| 520 | _a[2009] EWCA Civ 1311, 8 December 2009. Case concerns whether a tenant entering into a "Virtual Assignment" of a leasehold premises acts in breach of the standard-form alienation covenants contained in the lease. The previous judge ruled that it did but only because the tenant either parted with possession, was sharing or was permitting the sharing of possession of the premises. "Held": The previous judge was correct, and erred only in his conclusions that NatWest had either parted with possession or at least shared or permitted the sharing of the property. Supreme Court has refused permission to appeal against CA decision. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aCLARENCE HOUSE LTD V NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PLC |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-COMMERCIAL LEASES | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2009/1311.html _zView the judgement free of charge at www.bailii.org... |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c82226 _d82226 |
||