000			01481cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS38857
008			090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u12827
041			_aeng
245			_aAddis Ltd v Clement (VO)
260			_c1988
350			_a0
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v(1988) 1 WLR 301-306(6)
520			_aHL 11 February 1988. Appeal by ratepayers (A) from CA decision in favour of VO (C), on the proper interpretation of the General Rate Act 1967 s20. A`s industrial hereditament was situated a very short distance from the Lower Swansea Valley Enterprise Zone. It was common ground that one result of the setting up of the zone was to depress the rental values of commercial and industrial property situated outside but in the vicinity of the designated area. A proposed a reduction in rates on the hereditament on grounds that establishment of the zone had adversely affected the value of the hereditament. Firstly the LVC and then, on appeal, LT held that by virtue of the General Rate Act 1967 s20(1)(b) (which concerns the locality in which a hereditament is situated), the consequences of setting up the zone was properly to be taken into account and the valuation of the hereditament was reduced accordingly. On appeal to CA, C`s appeal was allowed. On appeal to HL by A, CA`s decision was revers
650			_aENTERPRISE ZONES
650			_aSWANSEA
690			_aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c8224 _d8224