000			01564cam a22002415a 4500
001			L151157
008			101004e2010 xxk 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u151157
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aRoadside Group Limited v Zara Commercial Limited
260			_c2010
520			_a[2010] EWHC 1950 (Ch), 30 July 2010. Appeal considers whether a tenant was liable under its lease for particular activities of its subtenant. Respondent landlord (Z) contended that tenant (R) was as a result of its subtenant (T) in breach of a covenant in its underlease not to use the demised premises "for the parking of motor vehicles for sale on any forecourt" and that Z was thereby entitled to forfeiture of the underlease and possession of the demised premises. Held: R was not in breach of the parking covenant because T was to blame. Found that the phrase in R's contract "not to use" referred to breaches by R not its subtenant T.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aROADSIDE GROUP LTD V ZARA COMMERCIAL LTD
650	2	4	_aMORRELLS OF OXFORD LTD V OXFORD UNITED FOOTBALL CLUB AND OTHERS
650	2	4	_aBERTON V ALLIANCE ECONOMIC INVESTMENT CO
650	2	4	_aEARL OF SEFTON V TOPHAMS LTD
650	2	4	_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S79
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-COMMERCIAL LEASES-BREACHING COMMERCIAL LEASES
856	4	8	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2010/1950.html _zView the law report free of charge at www.bailii.org
942			_n0
999			_c82715 _d82715