000			01713cab a22002655a 4500
001			L151327
008			101021e20100412xxk 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u151327
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aScotia Plastic Binding (in administration) v London Development Agency
260			_c2010
520			_a[2010] UKUT 98 (LC), 12 April 2010. Consider whether claimants entitled to compensation can recover losses that they should have avoided. Claimant S's warehouse in Stratford was compulsorily purchased by respondent L in May 2006 for the Olympic Park development. L leased the property back to S giving it until June 2001 to vacate. S however moved to a new premises in Crayford in June 2006. Did S fail unreasonably to mitigate its loss of profits by moving to Crayford when it did?. Held: judgment against S. L had suggested three options located closer than to central London than Crayford . S had other options than Crayford so it could not recover losses.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aSCOTIA PLASTIC BINDING (IN ADMINISTRATION) V LONDON DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
650	2	4	_aDIRECTOR OF BUILDINGS AND LANDS V SHUNG FUNG IRONWORKS LTD
650	2	4	_aAPPLEBY & IRELAND V HAMPSHIRE CC
650	2	4	_aTHE SIVAND
650	2	4	_aHARVEY V CRAWLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPN
650	2	4	_aLAND COMPENSATION ACT 1973
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/LC/2010/ACQ_360_2008.html _zView the law report free of charge at www.bailii.org
942			_n0
999			_c82772 _d82772