000			01629cab a22002775a 4500
001			L151969
008			110117s2010 xxk 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u151969
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aReid, Tim
245	0	1	_a"When is a house not a house?"
260			_c2010
490		0	_aHogan Lovells Real Estate Quarterly _vWinter 2010, 5-7 (3)
520			_a"Day and another v Hosebay Ltd; Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Lexgorge Ltd" (see L150503) confirmed that companies which hold long leases of former houses can in certain circumstances buy the freehold to those buildings even though they have long since been converted to commercial use. CA affirmed that a building qualifies as a "house" within the meaning of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s2 if it is "reasonably so called" and the fact that a building can be reasonably called something other than a house does not preclude it also reasonably being called a house. "Earl Cadogan and another v Panagopoulos and another" [2010] EWCA Civ 1259 is a recent setback to landlords resisting enfranchisement claims.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aLEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967 S2
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954
650	2	4	_aDAY AND ANOTHER V HOSEBAY LTD
650	2	4	_aHOWARD DE WALDEN ESTATES LTD V LEXGORGE LTD
650	2	4	_aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993
650	2	4	_aEARL CADOGAN AND ANOTHER V PANAGOPOULOS AND ANOTHER
650	2	4	_aPROSPECT ESTATES LTD V GROSVENOR ESTATES LTD
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT
942			_n0
999			_c82874 _d82874