| 000 | 01197cab a22001935a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | E151980 | ||
| 008 | 110117e20100910xxk 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u151980 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aDinesh Dhamija [and] Tani Dhamija v Sunningdale Joineries Ltd, Lewandowski Willcox Limited, McBains Cooper Consulting Limited _h[electronic resource] |
| 260 | _c2010 | ||
| 520 | _a[2010] EWHC 2396 (TCC) 10 September 2010. Considers whether a quantity surveyor has a duty to only value work that has been properly executed by a contractor and is not obviously defective. Suggests that such a duty was implied by the terms of the building contract which said that the quantity surveyor should include in his interim certificate a percentage based on the value of the works "properly executed". Concludes that the claim is unsustainable in this case because the QS complied with this duty. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aDHAMIJA AND ANOR V SUNNINGDALE JOINERIES LTD AND ORS |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 |
_aQuantity surveying _96263 |
||
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2010/2396.html _zView the case free of charge at www.bailii.org |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c82875 _d82875 |
||