| 000 | 01228cad a22002175a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | E152720 | ||
| 008 | 110418e20090407xxk 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u152720 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aShaw, Murray | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aPlanning appeals & deemed refusal _ba surprising decision? _h[electronic resource] |
| 260 | _c2009 | ||
| 490 |
_aBiggart Baillie Ideas and Insights _v7 April 2009 |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the decision in the case Vattenfall Wind Power Ltd v Scottish Ministers, in which the Court took the view that the right to appeal on the grounds of non-determination lasted for six months from the date upon which the statutory period for the planning authority to make a decision expired, whether or not the planning authority and the applicant had reached any other agreement. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aVATTENFALL WIND POWER LIMITED V SCOTTISH MINISTERS |
| 651 | 4 |
_aScotland _y1999- |
|
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://www.biggartbaillie.co.uk/ideas--insights/all-articles/planning--construction/planning-appeals--deemed-refusal-?-a-surprising-decision _zView the article free of charge at www.biggartbaillie.co.uk |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c83071 _d83071 |
||