| 000 | 00867cab a22002295a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L152780 | ||
| 008 | 110427e20110416xxk 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u152780 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aBickford-Smith, Stephen | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aUnder a shadow |
| 260 | _c2011 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1115) 16 April 2011, 82-84(3) |
||
| 520 | _aImplications for the development industry after HXRUK II (CHC) Ltd v Heaney [2010] which was settled before the hearing of the appeal. Argues that developers cannot assume that rights of lights can be paid off prior to or duing the course of a trial. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aHXRUK II (CHC) LTD V HEANEY |
| 651 | 4 |
_aUnited Kingdom _y |
|
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-PROPERTY MANAGEMENT-RIGHTS TO LIGHT DETERMINATIONS-RIGHT TO LIGHT | ||
| 700 | 1 | _aBaker, Matthew | |
| 700 | 1 | _aShaw, Keith | |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c83086 _d83086 |
||