000			01594cab a22002775a 4500
001			L152795
008			110428s2011 xxk 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u152795
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aBarnes, Michael
245	0	0	_aPointe Gourde principle _bend of the road
260			_c2011
490		0	_aRating and Valuation Reporter _v51(3) [2011] RVR, 66-71(6)
520			_aHL in Spirerose Ltd (in administration) v Transport for London (2009) (see E148160) ended Pointe Gourde as a supposedly independent doctrine of law. Goes back to the origin of the principle in the Pointe Gourde Privy Council decision ([1947] AC 656), asks what was thought to have been established by the principle and looks at how it was adapted into statutory form. Concludes that the value to the owner rule or an aspect of it which might be disguised as Pointe Gourde is now wholely contained in the relevant statutory provisions Pointe Gourde's only function today is to assist where there is a disputed construction of the statutory provisions.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aSPIREROSE LTD V TRANSPORT FOR LONDON
650	2	4	_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1947
650	2	4	_aPOINTE GOURDE QUARRYING AND TRANSPORT CO LTD V CROWN LANDS SUPERINTENDENT
650	2	4	_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990
650	2	4	_aLAND COMPENSATION ACT 1961
650	2	4	_aLANDS CLAUSES CONSOLIDATION ACT 1845
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
700	1		_aCaws, Eian
942			_n0
999			_c83097 _d83097