| 000 | 01394cad a22002055a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L152967 | ||
| 008 | 110518e20110131xxk 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u152967 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aMW Trustees Limited , Robert Posel, Pamela Posel v Telular Corporation |
| 260 | _c2011 | ||
| 520 | _a[2011] EWHC 104 (Ch), 31 January 2011. Considers the validity of a break notice served on the incorrect landlord where the managing agent purported to accept it. Defendant (T) had the option to break its lease with claimant landlord (MW) by giving not less than six months' notice in writing but served the notice on the previous landlord not MW . MW's managing agent accepted the notice in an invalid email form agreeing that T could break the lease. MW argued that the break was not effective. "Held": The notice was valid. The managing agent's reply accepted the notice as valid despite the defective method of service. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aMW TRUSTEES LTD AND ORS V TELULAR CORPORATION |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aMANNAI INVESTMENT CO LTD V EAGLE STAR LIFE ASSURANCE CO LTD UK |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-COMMERCIAL LEASES | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2011/104.html _zView the law report free of charge at www.bailii.org |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c83152 _d83152 |
||