| 000 | 01092cab a22002295a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L153456 | ||
| 008 | 110729e20110723xxk 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u153456 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aWoolgar, Dermot | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aStill an empty concept? |
| 260 | _c2011 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1129) 23 July 2011, 84-85(2) |
||
| 520 | _aReports on the Court of Appeal's decision in NYK Logistics (UK) Ltd v Ibrend Estates BV [2011] EWCA Civ 683 on the subject of break clauses. This case gives a clear definition of vacant possession but several problems arrise such as the distinction given between people and chattels. Arguably the decision in NYK is best understood not as a change in the law on vacant possession but rather a reformulation of existing principles. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aNYK Logistics (UK) Ltd v Ibrend Estates BV [2011] |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT | ||
| 700 | 1 | _aShaw, Keith | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY MARKET |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c83298 _d83298 |
||