000			01341cab a22002055a 4500
001			E153579
008			110808e20110519xxk 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u153579
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aGladehurst Properties Limited v Farid Hashemi (on behalf of himself and Matthew Johnson) _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2011
520			_a[2011] EWCA Civ 604, 19 May 2011. H and another had been tenants of a flat, on which a deposit was paid to G. The deposit was not placed within a tenancy deposit scheme. At the end of the tenancy, a deduction was made from the deposit before it was returned to H, to account for repairs and unpaid bills. H challenged this and made a claim for three times the amount of the deposit, under the Housing Act 2004 S214, on the basis that the rules relating to tenancy deposit schemes had not been followed. A previous judge had found for the defendents. "Held": appeal allowed. Once a lease has expired, a claim under S214 cannot be made.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aGLADEHURST PROPERTIES v HASHEMI AND ANOR
650	2	4	_aHOUSING ACT 2004 S214
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-LEASEHOLD PROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2011/604.html _zView the judgement free of charge at www.bailii.org
942			_n0
999			_c83320 _d83320