| 000 | 01024cab a22002295a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L153760 | ||
| 008 | 110825e20110820xxk 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u153760 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aWaltham, Anne | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aPower to the arbitrator |
| 260 | _c2011 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1133) 20 August 2011, 60-61(2) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines the issues created by the decision in 'Cordoba v Ballymore', where the tenants applied to challenge a rent review arbitration award. The decision further illustrates the policy behind the Arbitration Act 1996 to restrict court intervention in disputes where the parties have agreed to arbitrate unless an aspect has gone severely wrong, | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aCordoba Holdings Ltd v Ballymore Properties Ltd |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aARBITRATION ACT 1996 |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION | ||
| 700 | 1 | _aBarker, Paul | |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c83363 _d83363 |
||