| 000 | 01626cab a22002775a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L153779 | ||
| 008 | 110830s2011 xxk 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u153779 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aGilbert, Dellah | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aWaiving and drowning _bhandling break notices with care |
| 260 | _c2011 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aHogan Lovells Real Estate Quarterly _vSummer 2011, 7-9(3) |
|
| 520 | _aExamines recent case law highlighting the difficulties encountered by tenants in serving valid break notices, specifically "MW Trustees Limited, Robert Posel and Pamela Posel v Telular Corporation"[2011] EWHC104 (see L152967). Sets out the legal framework, both statute and case law , relating to the service tenants' contractual break notice. Provides an analysis of the facts of 'Telular' and the judgment which may have turned the tables in favour of tenants. Tenants should take legal advice to ensure the valid operation of a break clause because the consequences of getting it wrong can be disastrous. Landlords also when receiving potentially defective should get legal help. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aMANNAI INVESTMENT CO LTD V EAGLE STAR LIFE ASSURANCE CO LTD UK |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aLEMMERBELL LTD AND ANOTHER V BRITANNIA LAS DIRECT LTD |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aPRUDENTIAL V EXEL UK |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aORCHARD (DEVELOPMENTS) HOLDINGS PLC V REUTERS LTD |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aHOTGROUP V ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aMW TRUSTEES LTD AND ORS V TELULAR CORPORATION |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c83372 _d83372 |
||