| 000 | 01405cab a22002535a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L154009 | ||
| 008 | 111003e20110924xxk 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u154009 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aFoo, Alicia | |
| 245 | 0 | 4 | _aThe future is bright |
| 260 | _c2011 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1138) 24 September 2011, 98-100(3) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses CA's interpretation of the Electronic Communications Code regarding compensation payable to landlowners by telecommunication operators for installation and retention in "Blackwater Canal Company Ltd v Geo Networks Ltd" [2010] EWHC 548 (Ch). Explains how the Code distinguishes between ordinary landowners (general regime) and other landlowners mostly infrastructure providers such as highway authorities, rail and canal companies described as special regimes. "Blackwater" fell into the special regime category. Law Commission is reviewing the code in light of "Blackwater" and is due to publish its recommendations in 2013. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aTELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT 1984 SCHED 2 |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aCOMMUNICATIONS ACT 2003 |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aBRIDGEWATER CANAL COMPANY LTD V GEO NETWORKS LTD |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aMERCURY COMMUNICATIONS LTD V LONDON AND INDIA DOCK INVESTMENT LTD |
| 651 | 4 |
_aUnited Kingdom _y |
|
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-INFRASTRUCTURE-TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE | ||
| 700 | 1 | _aTaggart, Nicholas | |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c83448 _d83448 |
||