000			01415cab a22002055a 4500
001			L154579
008			120103e2011 xxk 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u154579
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aQuirkco Investments Ltd v Aspray Transport Ltd _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2011
520			_a[2011] EWHC 3060 (Ch), 23 November 2011. The ability to terminate a contract may be a matter of interpretation. Considers whether defendant tenant A had successfully exercised a conditional break clause in respect of a lease on commercial premises owned by claimant landlord Q. Q contended that A's notice was ineffective because A was in breach of its obligations under the lease and so was prevented by the terms of the lease from serving a valid notice under the break clause. "Held": Court found for A. However the question whether A's lease ended on the 18 December 2010 or will continue until 2015 remains unclear.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aQUIRKCO INVESTMENTS LTD V ASPRAY TRANSPORT LTD
650	2	4	_aCAPITAL AND CITY HOLDINGS LTD V DEAN WARBURG LTD AND ORS
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-COMMERCIAL LEASES-BREACHING COMMERCIAL LEASES
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2011/3060.html _zView the law report free of charge at www.bailii.org
942			_n0
999			_c83673 _d83673