000			01323cab a22002055a 4500
001			L154582
008			120103e2011 xxk 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u154582
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aHirose Electrical UK Ltd v Peak Ingredients Ltd _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2011
520			_a[2011] EWCA Civ 987, 11 August 2011. Sheds light on when odours emanating from a property legally constitute a nuisance for neighbours and the importance of a property's locality in determining whether its odours are a nuisance. Appellant H, a mobile phone manufacture, leased an industrial unit adjacent to respondent P, a food additives producer: the units being only separated by a porous breeze-block party wall. H contended that smells wafting from P's premises constituted a nuisance to its employees and premises. "Held": Appeal dismissed. P's odours did not constitute a nuisance. The decision took into account the industrial estate's character.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aHIROSE ELECTRICAL UK LTD V PEAK INGREDIENTS LTD
650	2	4	_aCAMBRIDGE WATER V EASTERN COUNTIES LEATHER PLC
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aEnvironment _96238
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2011/987.html _zView the law report free of charge at www.bailii.org
942			_n0
999			_c83676 _d83676