000			01213cab a22002055a 4500
001			L154585
008			120103e2011 xxk 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u154585
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aRoger Williams and others v Redcard Ltd and others _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2011
520			_a[2011] EWCA Civ 466, 20 April 2011. Considers whether a limited company had properly executed a property sale contract or not. Appellant W alleged that respondent R had not properly executed a sale contract to W in respect of R's interest in a building which R was the freeholder: the contract did not state that signatories signed on behalf of Redcard. "Held": CA decided R had properly executed the contract. Recommended that care must be taken to comply with formalities to avoid expensive litigation.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aROGER WILLIAMS AND ORS V REDCARD LTD AND ORS
650	2	4	_aCOMPANIES ACT 2006 S44(4)
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2011/466.html _zView the law report free of charge at www.bailii.org
942			_n0
999			_c83679 _d83679