| 000 | 01392cab a22002055a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L154627 | ||
| 008 | 120106e20111125xxk 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u154627 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aRoss, Jonathan | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aLegal case news _bhow to get ahead in advertising, Stadium CapitalHoldings (No 2) v St Marylebone Property Company |
| 260 | _c2011 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aProperty Week _v77(47) 25 November 2011, 65(1) |
|
| 520 | _a"Stadium Capital Holdings (No 2) v St Marylebone Property Company" [2011] EWHC 2856 (Ch), 8 November 2011 concerns how damages for trespass should be calculated in relation to an advertising hoarding erected over an adjoining owner's airspace. Claimant S owned a cleared development site. Defendant M owned the adjoining building with an advertising hoarding on its flank wall. Permission for the hoarding which projected into the adjoining airspace was terminated by M in 2005 but the hoarding stood until October 2008. S sought to recoup from M advertising revenue damages earned over that period. "Held": neither party proved the case for receipt of all the revenue so the court awarded S 50% of the revenue following normal market practice. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aSTADIUM CAPITAL HOLDINGS (NO 2) V ST MARYLEBONE PROPERTY COMPANY |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c83686 _d83686 |
||