000			01600cab a22002295a 4500
001			L154631
008			120109e20111007xxk 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u154631
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aGordon, Warren
245	0	0	_aLegal case news _bdefinition of superior landlord's consent, British Telecommunications Ltd v Rail Safety & Standards Board Ltd
260			_c2011
490			_aProperty Week _v77(40) 7 October 2011, 72-73(2)
520			_a"British Telecommunications Ltd v Rail Safety & Standards Board Ltd" [2011] EWHC 2909 (Ch) determined at what point a superior landlord's consent is granted when letting a property and whether a formal licence executed by all parties is required in such circumstances or the superior landlord's consent alone is sufficient. Claimant B as landlord of a commercial property had entered into an underlease agreement with defendant R which required the consent of the superior landlord by way of licences. R later sought to terminate this agreement and did not comply with B's notice to complete. B treated the agreement as ended. "Held": HC found for B. superior landlord's consent referred to obtaining the superior landlord's consent.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aBRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD v RAIL SAFETY & STANDARDS BOARD LTD
650	2	4	_aMOUNT EDEN LAND V PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE
650	2	4	_aAUBERGINE ENTERPRISES LTD V LAKEWOOD INTERNATIONAL LTD
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-COMMERCIAL LEASES
942			_n0
999			_c83688 _d83688