000			01318cab a22002055a 4500
001			L154642
008			120109e20110506xxk 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u154642
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aGordon, Warren
245	0	0	_aLegal case news _bextra effort insufficient for extrication from contract, Extra MSA Services Cobham v Accor UK Economy Hotels
260			_c2011
490		0	_aProperty Week _v77(18) 6 May 2011, 57(1)
520			_a[2011] EWHC 775 (Ch), 17 March 2011. Considers the important commercial issue of whether a party to a conditional agreement can exercise a right to terminate the agreement because the condition has not been satisfied although the same party was responsible for the failure to satisfy the condition. Applicant commercial developer E tried to extricate itself from a contract agreed with defendant A on the basis that a condition was not satisfied. A contended that E should not benefit from non-compliance with its contractual obligation. "Held": Application refused. HC decided that a party should not benefit from its own wrongdoing.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aEXTRA MSA SERVICES COBHAM LTD; EXTRA MSA COBHAM LIMITED v ACCOR UK ECONOMY HOTELS LTD; ACCOR SA
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
942			_n0
999			_c83695 _d83695