| 000 | 01305cad a22002175a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L154967 | ||
| 008 | 120213e20111219xxk 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u154967 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aAvocet Industrial Estates LLP v Merol Ltd and Tudor Rose International Ltd |
| 260 | _c2011 | ||
| 520 | _a[2011] EWHC 3422 (Ch), 19 December 2011. The right to break a lease early is valuable for a tenant but its exercise is often fraught with difficulties, some unknown to the tenant. Defendant tenant M served a break notice on its rented premises, acting to satisfy all conditions to break including delivering a cheque for the requisite six months' rent to claimant landlord A. A disputed that the lease had been terminated as the rent cheque had not been cleared by the break date and interest had not been paid. "Held": in favour of A. M's liability to pay the interest was inescapable and M remained bound to the lease. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aAVOCET INDUSTRIAL ESTATES LLP V MEROL LTD AND ANOR |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aHOMES V SMITH |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aBEEVERS V MASON |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 |
_aLandlord and tenant _96252 |
||
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2011/3422.html _zView the law report free of charge at www.bailii.org |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c83763 _d83763 |
||