| 000 | 01201cad a22002415a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L156480 | ||
| 008 | 120528e20120519xxk 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u156480 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aMantle, Lisa | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aOut like a light |
| 260 | _c2012 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(1220) 19 May 2012, 88-89(2) |
||
| 520 | _aA Mainly for students article looks at ways developers can protect themselves from potential rights to light claims. These include physically blocking the right of light before the expiry of the 20 year period under the Prescription Act 1832 and by making an application under Rights of Lights Act 1959 s2 in the form of a light obstruction notice (LON). Explains how to make a LON application."HRRUKII (CHC) Ltd v Heaney" [2012] EWHC 2245 (Ch) sets out the procedure for considering whether an injunction should be granted based on the "Shelfer" test principles. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aHKRUK II (CHC) LTD V HEANEY |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aSHELFER V CITY OF LONDON ELECTRIC LIGHTING CO |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aPRESCRIPTION ACT 1832 |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aRIGHTS OF LIGHT ACT 1959 S2 |
| 651 | 4 |
_aUnited Kingdom _y |
|
| 690 |
_aRights of light _96267 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c84037 _d84037 |
||