000 01236cad a22002175a 4500
001 L156780
008 120713e2012 xxk 000 0 eng d
035 _a(Sirsi) u156780
041 0 _aeng
245 0 0 _aRajesh Patel and others v MRD Property Developments Ltd
_h[electronic resource]
260 _c2012
520 _a[2012] EWCA Civ 727, 31 May 2012. Concerns what a landlord needs to provide to a tenant to recover the costs of insurance premiums in a situation where a lease requires provision of a "written demand". Appellant P argued that his lease was wrongly forfeited, claiming that the relevant arrears included insurance rent that had not been demanded. "Held": Appeal dismissed. The court found that the provision of the insurance demand constituted a written demand from the defendant landlord M to the tenants.
590 _aKA
650 2 4 _aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S146
650 2 4 _aPATEL AND ORS V MRD PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS LTD
650 2 4 _aMANNAI INVESTMENT CO LTD V EAGLE STAR LIFE ASSURANCE CO LTD UK
651 4 _aEngland and Wales
_y1543-
690 _aLandlord and tenant
_96252
856 4 0 _uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2012/727.html
_zView the law report at www.bailii.org
942 _n0
999 _c84154
_d84154