000			01311cab a22002535a 4500
001			L156894
008			120727s2012 xxk 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u156894
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aKing, Vivien
245	0	0	_aWhat is the meaning of the oft-used words 'vacant possession'?
260			_c2012
490		0	_aJournal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation _v1(1), March 2012, 58-62(5)
520			_aWhat do the words 'vacant possession' really mean and how does one know that the concept has been achieved? Looks at the important CA judgment "NYK Logistics (UK) Ltd v Ibrend Estates BV" [2011] EWCA Civ 683 (L154668) where CA took the opportunity to review previous case law relating to the meaning and effect of the phrase "vacant possession". The judges in this case have gone a long way to assist practitioners in determining what needs to be removed in order to deliver up vacant possession of property.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aNYK LOGISTICS (UK) LTD v IBREND ESTATES BV
650	2	4	_aLYON V LONDON CITY & MIDLAND BANK
650	2	4	_aCUMBERLAND CONSOLIDATED HOLDINGS LTD V IRELAND
650	2	4	_aROYAL BRITISH PERMANENT SOCIETY V BOMASH
650	2	4	_aENGELL V FITCH
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aLandlord and tenant _96252
942			_n0
999			_c84191 _d84191