000			01369cad a22002175a 4500
001			L156956
008			120731e2012 xxk 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u156956
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aEdward Barker v Hambleton District Council
260			_c2012
520			_a[2012] EWCA Civ 610, 9 May 2012. Concerns the application to quash part of the "Hambleton Allocations Development Plan Document"(ADPD), a processed governed by s113 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. Appellant B's application was dismissed in the Administrative Court for want of jurisdiction on the basis that it was out of time. B appealed. "Held": appeal dismissed. No impairment of "the very essence" of the right of access to the court had occurred. Planning cases are not simply of bilateral significance: other parties were entitled to assume, without the need to engage in litigation, that if no valid application was made within the statutory time limit, the ADPD would be beyond challenge.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aEDWARD BARKER V HAMBLETON DC
650	2	4	_aHINDE V RUGBY BC
650	2	4	_aPLANNING AND COMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 2004 S113
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPlanning and development _96259
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2012/610.html _zView the law report at www.bailii.org
942			_n0
999			_c84211 _d84211