| 000 | 01088cad a22002175a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L157294 | ||
| 008 | 121011e2012 xxk 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u157294 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aDay and another v Hosebay Ltd; Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Lexgorge Ltd |
| 260 | _c2012 | ||
| 520 | _a[2012] UKSC 41, 10 October 2012. Two co-joined appeals concerned with the definition of a house for enfranchisement purposes under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s2(1). Properties used entirely for commercial purposes are not houses within the meaning of s2(1) whatever their original design or current appearance. Held: Appeal allowed. CA decisions overturned. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aDAY AND ANOTHER V HOSEBAY LTD |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aHOWARD DE WALDEN ESTATES LTD V LEXGORGE LTD |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aLEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967 S2(1) |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 |
_aResidential property _96266 |
||
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://www.supremecourt.gov.uk/docs/uksc-2010-0147-judgment.pdf _zView the law report free of charge at www.supremecourt.gov.uk |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c84321 _d84321 |
||