000			01654cad a22002655a 4500
001			L157323
008			121017s2012 xxk 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u157323
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aDitchburn, Mathew
245	0	0	_aAfter the goldrush
260			_c2012
490		0	_aHogan Lovells Real Estate Quarterly _vSummer Issue, 10-11(2)
520			_aConsiders whether the status of the decision in "Goldacre (Offices) Ltd v Nortel Networks UK Ltd (in administration)" ([2009] EWHC 3389 (Ch) (L154706)) about rent payable in administration, heralded as a victory for landlords, can remain untarnished when it has led to further disputes, most importantly "Leisure (Norwich) II Ltd and ors v Luminar lava Ignite Ltd (in administration)" ([2012 EWHC 951 (Ch) (L156895)). "Goldacre" has created unfairness on all sides but remains good law, judicially endorsed in "Luminar" as "plainly right".
650	2	4	_aGOLDACRE (OFFICES) LTD v NORTEL NETWORKS UK LTD (IN ADMINISTRATION)
650	2	4	_aLEISURE (NORWICH) II LTD V LUMINAR LAVA IGNITE LTD (IN ADMINISTRATION)
650	2	4	_aRE ATLANTIC COMPUTER SYSTEMS
650	2	4	_aRE TOSHOKU FINANCE PLC (IN LIQUIDATION)
650	2	4	_aEXETER CITY COUNCIL V BAIRSTOW
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aLandlord and tenant _96252
690			_aCommercial property _96227
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.hoganlovells.com/newsmedia/newspubs/List.aspx?PublicationTypes=8d563981-63d3-440c-b56b-c804d4c057dc&Industry=0c7d5441-1de6-4616-927f-e2b37a6367be _zView the article at www.hoganlovells.com -1de6-4616-927f-e2b37a6367be _zView the article at www.hoganlovells.com
942			_n0
999			_c84333 _d84333