| 000 | 01136cad a22001935a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L157405 | ||
| 008 | 121123e2012 xxk 000 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u157405 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aParkingeye Limited v Somerfield Stores Limited _h[electronic resource] |
| 260 | _c2012 | ||
| 520 | _a[2012] EWCA Civ 1338, 17 October 2012. CA clarifies whether a contract will be automatically unenforceable because of illegality. Claimant P contractually provided an automated monitoring and control system for 17 of defendant S's car parks. P sued S for breach of contract as S terminated a contract after only six months. S claimed that the contract was void because P deployed unlawful means to collect some of the parking charges. "Held": CA dismissed S's appeal: the contract was valid as the unlawful act related to only a small part of the contract. | ||
| 590 | _aKA | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aPARKINGEYE LTD V SOMERFIELD STORES LTD |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland and Wales _y1543- |
|
| 690 |
_aContracts _96232 |
||
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2012/1338.html _zView the judgment at www.bailii.org |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c84367 _d84367 |
||