000			01396cab a22002655a 4500
001			L158213
008			141015e20141010xxk 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u158213
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aSculthorpe, Helen
245	0	0	_aMarket evidence
260			_c2014
490			_aNew Law Journal _v164(7625) 10 October 2014, 13-14(2)
520			_aDiscusses the advantages of using expert market based valuation evidence to work out relativity for freehold and leasehold extensions rather than reliance on RICS endorsed relativity graphs in the light of "Kosta v Trustees of the Phillimore Estate" [2014] UKUT 0319 (LC) which accepted the market based approach put forward by the tenant K's expert valuer rather than the relativity graphs used by the landlord T's valuer. Stresses the importance of market based evidence in working out relativity. Refers to "Arrowdell Ltd v Coniston Court (North) Hove Ltd (LRA/72/2005) and Nailrile Ltd v Cadogan which considered relativity.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aRELATIVITY
650	2	4	_aKOSTA V TRUSTEES OF THE PHILLIMORE ESTATE
650	2	4	_aARROWDELL V CONISTON COURT (NORTH) HOVE LTD
650	2	4	_aNAILRILE LTD V EARL CADOGAN
650	2	4	_aLEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967
650	2	4	_aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aValuation _96273
942			_n0
999			_c84531 _d84531