000			01315cab a22002775a 4500
001			L159154
008			160212e2016 xxk 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u159154
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aTaggart, Nic
245	0	0	_aDarkness on the edge of town? Or is the calculation of consequential losses in dilapidation claims harder than it looks? (Part 1)
260			_c2016
490			_aJournal of Building Survey, Appraisal & Valuation _v4(3) Winter 2015-16, 130-142(13)
520			_aA series of two articles looking at the calculation of consquential losses for breach of tenant's covenants in dilapidations claims. Part 1 looks at different ways of quantifying damages comparing contrasting rules in "Joyner v Weeks" [1891] 2 QB 31 and "Ruxley Electronics & Construction v Forsyth" [1996] AC 344. It also summarises the general law on causation, remoteness of damage and recovering the reasonable costs of mitigation. (Taken from abstract). (For Part 2 see L15219)
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aDilapidations _96235
650	2	4	_aCONSEQUENTIAL LOSS
650	2	4	_aCAUSATION
650	2	4	_aDAMAGE
650			_aCOSTS
650	2	4	_aJOYNER V WEEKS
650	2	4	_aRUXLEY ELECTRONICS & CONSTRUCTION V FORSYTH
651		4	_aUnited Kingdom _y
690			_aDilapidations _96235
942			_n0
999			_c84812 _d84812