000			01657cab a22003135a 4500
001			L159270
008			110718s2016 xxk f g 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u159270
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aLupton, Sarah
245	0	0	_aDesign liability _bProblems with defining extent and level
260			_c2016
490			_aInternational Construction Law Review _v33 (2) April 2016, 96-110(15)
520			_aFocuses on the important and still controversial question of the extent of a Design and Build Contractor's design obligation where following the design produces an inadequate outcome. Explores cases where the extent or level has not been clearly set out, sometimes with unexpected results. The projects covered are of varied scale, but all involve some allocation of design responsibility to the contractor and provide useful lessons for those involved in drafting tender packages.
650	2	4	_aDESIGN LIABILITY
650	2	4	_aCONTRACTORS DESIGN
650	2	4	_aWalter Lilly & Company Ltd v Mackay & Anor
650	2	4	_aNATIONAL MUSEUMS AND GALLERIES ON MERSEYSIDE V AEW ARCHITECTS AND DESIGNERS LTD
650	2	4	_aILIFFE V FELTHAM CONSTRUCTION LTD
650	2	4	_aTREBOR BASSETT HOLDINGS LTD V ADT FIRE AND SECURITY
650	2	4	_aCOSTAIN LTD V CHARLES HASWELL & PARTNERS LTD
650	2	4	_aMT HOJGAARD A/S V E.ON CLIMATE AND RENEWABLES UK ROBIN RIGG EAST LTD
650	2	4	_aGREATER VANCOUVER WATER DISTRICT V NORTH AMERICAN PIPE AND STEEL LTD
650	2	4	_aMW HIGH TECH PROJECTS UK LTD V HAASE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING GMBH
651		4	_aInternational
690			_aContracts _96232
690			_aProcurement _96260
942			_n0
999			_c84857 _d84857