000 01501cab a22003015a 4500
001 L160144
008 180808e2018 xxk 000 0 eng d
035 _a(Sirsi) u160144
041 0 _aeng
100 1 _aO'Connor, Alex
245 0 0 _aHeld to ransom
_h[electronic resource]
260 _c2018
490 _aRICS Property Journal
_vJuly-August 2018, 16-18(2)
520 _aConsiders how ransom strips should be valued noting that there is no statutory framework governing their valuation. Refers to case law including "Stokes v Cambridge Corporation" (1961] 180 EG 839, "Wards Construction (Medway) Ltd v Barclays Bank plc and "Kent CC" [1994] 68 P&CR 391, "Batchelor v Kent CC" [1988] 56 P&CR 320, "Ozanne and others v Hertfordshire CC" [1989] 43 EG 217 "Persimmon Homes Ltd v Hillier and others" [2018] EWHC 221 (Ch). Discusses options available to a developer if the titleholder refuses to sell or insists on an acceptable price.
650 2 4 _aRANSOM STRIPS
650 2 4 _aSTOKES V CAMBRIDGE CORPORATION
650 2 4 _aWARDS CONSTRUCTION (MEDWAY) V BARCLAYS BANK PLC
650 2 4 _aBATCHELOR V KENT CC
650 2 4 _aOZANNE V HERTFORDSHIRE CC
650 2 4 _aPERSIMMON HOMES LTD V HILLIER CC
651 4 _aUnited Kingdom
_y
690 _aCompulsory purchase
_96228
690 _aValuation
_96273
700 1 _aIngram, Helen
700 1 _aGreen, Stephanie
856 4 0 _uhttps://issuu.com/ricsmodus/docs/property_journal_july-august_2018
_yAvailable free online via Issuu
942 _n0
999 _c85174
_d85174