| 000 | 01112cab a2200337 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3301-67 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u13247 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aNegligence | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v(1996) EGCS 196 (14/12/96) |
||
| 520 | _a"Cormack v Washbourne" CA 2 December 1996. If the surveyor had looked at the geological map of the area he would have seen the house was sited close to reading beds and concluded there was a risk of subsidence. Subsequently, the plaintiffs would not have bought the house. Appeal dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aBUILDING SURVEY | ||
| 650 | _aCLAY SOILS | ||
| 650 | _aCORMACK V WASHBOURNE | ||
| 650 | _aDAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aDIMINUTION VALUE | ||
| 650 | _aDUTY TO WARN | ||
| 650 | _aGEOLOGICAL MAPS | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aREADING BEDS | ||
| 650 | _aSTRUCTURAL MOVEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aSTRUCTURAL SURVEY | ||
| 650 | _aSUBSIDENCE | ||
| 650 | _aSURVEYORS | ||
| 690 | _aPROFESSIONAL PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c8529 _d8529 |
||