| 000 | 01254cab a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS51164 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u13461 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aSoar, G. | ||
| 245 | _aValuation of local authority leisure properties for rating purposes | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aIRRV Journal _vJuly 1994, 158(1) |
||
| 520 | _aReports on a landmark decision by Nottinghamshire Valuation Tribunal which questions the use of the contractors test for a whole range of local authority leisure properties. A case study in point, is the Royal Centre, Nottingham, where the rv has been dramatically reduced from £1,230,000 to £174,000 a downwards adjustment of 86%. Considers that this may have implications for the valuation of some local authority hereditaments in the current list and probably far reaching ramifications for the revaluation in 1995. | ||
| 650 | _aCVONTRACTORS TEST | ||
| 650 | _aGARTON V HUNTER(VO) | ||
| 650 | _aLEISURE PROPERTY | ||
| 650 | _aLOCAL AUTHORITIES | ||
| 650 | _aNOTTINGHAM CC | ||
| 650 | _aPROFITS METHOD | ||
| 650 | _aRATING APPEALS | ||
| 650 |
_aValuation _96273 |
||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c8677 _d8677 |
||