| 000 | 01525cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS38962 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u13518 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aG P and P Ltd v Bulcraig and Davies and another | ||
| 260 | _c1988 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(8812) 26 March 1988, 103-111(5) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 27 October 1987 Appeal by solicitors Bulcraig & Davies (B) against a QBD decision, so far as the decision concerned the computation of damages and the order that they should pay the costs of the second defendants, a firm of surveyors , in an action by advertising agents for negligence . GP & P Ltd (G) had instructed the surveyors to find suitable offices to rent and retained B to act in connection with the acquisition. G`s receiver discovered that the ground floor of the acquired premises was subject to a planning condition restricting part to printing trade use only. The receiver found it impossible to dispose of the lease and it was eventually surrendered to the landlords for a payment. A crucial finding was that if G had known of the restriction, they would never have taken the lease. B did not appeal against the finding of negligence , but against the computation of damages and the order that they pay the costs of the surveyors. It was accepted that in calculating the damages | ||
| 650 | _aDAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aLIABILITY | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c8711 _d8711 |
||