000			01711cab a2200289 4500
001			ABS55052
008			090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u13832
041			_aeng
245			_aBolton MDC and others v SoS Environment and others
260			_c1996
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v[1996] 71 P&CR 309-322(8)
520			_aHL 24 May 1995. Upheld the HC decision, and overturning the CA decision concerning whether the SoS had taken due consideration of the impact of traffic upon a new development. SoS had given planning permission for a sub-regional shopping centre known as the Trafford Centre. B argued that the SoS had not given due consideration to the impact extra traffic would have and that the SoS had not given sufficient reasons for his decision. The CA had upheld the consortium of local authorities` objections, the SoS appealed to the HL. The HL concluded that the SoS had need to balance the provision of urban regeneration with environmental considerations and that he had investigated the implications of the development, and had explained his reasons although not necessarily as fully and as clearly as might be wished. Appeal allowed.
650			_aBOLTON MDC AND OTHERS V SOS ENVIRONMENT AND OTHERS
650			_aDUE CONSIDERATION
650			_aMANCHESTER SHIP CANAL COMPANY
650			_aOUT-OF-TOWN SHOPPING CENTRES
650			_aREGIONAL SHOPPING CENTRES
650			_aRETAIL IMPACT
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S70
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S77
650			_aTRAFFORD CENTRE
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c8926 _d8926