000			01520cab a2200265 4500
001			ABS55056
008			090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u13860
041			_aeng
245			_aHoughton v SoS Environment and Bromley LBC
260			_c1996
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v[1996] JPL 396-405(10)
520			_aQBD 12 January 1996. An application for planning permission to change the use of green belt woodland sited behind the applicant`s garden boundary to residential garden land including a tennis court, pavilion and mower store had been refused, a refusal which was upheld on appeal. Controversy centred on the interpretation of PPG2 paragraph 13 which allowed for the development of `outdoor sport` on green belt land. However even if the term encompassed private as well as public sport, the buildings constituted an unacceptable development and the whole project would set a precedent for neighbouring and similar properties. Appeal dismissed on grounds that such a development conflicted with the aim of the green belt, the UDP and the character of the woodland.
650			_aGREEN BELT LAND
650			_aHOUGHTON V SOS ENVIRONMENT AND BROMLEY LBC
650			_aOUTDOOR SPORT
650			_aPLANNING POLICY GUIDANCE NOTE 2 (GREEN BELTS)
650			_aTENNIS COURTS
650			_aWOODLAND
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c8949 _d8949