| 000 | 01061cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS55058 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u13871 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aYnys Mon BC v SoS Environment and Willder | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v[1996] JPL 405-410(6) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 17 February 1995. The second respondent re-applied for permission to erect a dwelling after the existing outline planning permission lapsed. It was concluded that the inspector, in granting the original planning permission had not fully considered rural planning guidelines or local structure plans and the re-application was therefore refused. | ||
| 650 | _aOUTLINE PLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aPPG1 | ||
| 650 | _aRESERVED MATTERS | ||
| 650 | _aRURAL DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S288 | ||
| 650 | _aYNYS MON BC V SOS ENVIRONMENT AND WILLDER | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c8957 _d8957 |
||