| 000 | 01225cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2724-15 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u13998 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aConsideration of relevant matter | ||
| 260 | _c1991 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEGCS _v1991 EGCS 62 |
||
| 520 | _aIn Landau v SOS for Environment and others QBD 4 June 1991, the landowner failed to get a cpo quashed under the Acquisition of Land Act 1981 S28 on the grounds that firstly, the first respondents had failed to take into consideration the financial difficulties of the appointed developer and secondly that the inspector had failed to give adequate reasons for conclusions adverse to the applicant`s alternative scheme. Held that it had not been shown that first respondent had not taken into account the financial difficulties of the proposed developer and the inspector had given enough reasons for dismissing the applicant`s alternative scheme. Applied Hope v SOS for Environment (1975 240 EG 627). Application dismissed. | ||
| 650 | _aLAW CASE | ||
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c9062 _d9062 |
||