000			01162cab a2200181 4500
001			ABS39071
008			090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u14223
041			_aeng
245			_aSmith and another v Northside Developments Ltd and another
260			_c1988
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1988) 55 PCR 164-170(7)
520			_aCA 11 May 1987. In 1982 the appellants (S) co-occupied shop premises, initially as licensees. In 1983 the co-occupier left and the defendants (N) orally agreed with S that they could occupy the premises on their own. Subsequently N tried to terminate S`s right to occupy by means of a notice to quit in seven days. S claimed that the license had become a tenancy as they had acquired exclusive occupation . The CC held that S had a license and not a tenancy but that the reasonable period of notice in the circumstances should be one month. The CA held that the licence had not not been converted into a tenancy by sole-occupation and that the appropriate period of notice was one month.
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c9241 _d9241