000			01130cab a2200217 4500
001			X1025
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u14255
041			_aeng
245			_aR v Harfield
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v1993 JPL 914-919(6)
520			_aCA 4 December 1992. Enforecment notice - appeal withdrawn - alleged continued infringement - criminal proceedings - prearrangement plea - questioning validity of the enforcement notice - misunderstanding of the considered agreed facts - plea of guilty entered - appeal to CA against conviction - position before issue of enforcement notice accepted as breach of planning control - right to put evidence to establish later position as ancillary to permitted use - Mansi doctrine - matter not argued before the judge so as to alert him of planning issues - appeal allowed and conviction quashed.
650			_aCRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
650			_aENFORCEMENT NOTICES
650			_aMANSI DOCTRINE
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c9264 _d9264