| 000 | 01009cab a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3205-53 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u14365 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aArchitects fees | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v1996 EGCS 1 (27/01/96) |
||
| 520 | _a"Hewitt v Alex Sayer Project Services" CA 15 January 1996. H asked A for plans and estimates for a stable block. H then dropped the project because it was too expensive. A commenced proceedings for the balance of fees. Held, the initial letter was not an entire contract and that A could claim on a quantum meruit basis. H appealed. Appeal allowed. | ||
| 650 | _aARCHITECTS' FEES | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 650 | _aHEWITT V ALEX SAYER PROJECT SERVICES | ||
| 650 | _aPROFESSIONAL FEES | ||
| 650 | _aQUANTUM MERUIT | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c9348 _d9348 |
||