| 000 | 01248cab a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3205-54 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u14373 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aSurveyors negligence | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v1996 EGCS 3 (27/01/96) |
||
| 520 | _a"Birmingham Midshires Building Society v Richard Pamplin and Co" QBD 11 January 1996. On B`s instructions, R valued a house in Hampstead for mortgage purposes. It was not R`s usual locality so he contacted four local agents for details of comparable properties and valued it at £205,000. B claimed R was negligent on grounds that the price was incorrect and the valuation was not carried out correctly. B relied on expert evidence and argued that a competent valuer would have valued the property at £140,000. Judgment for B | ||
| 650 | _aBIRMINGHAM MIDSHIRES BUILDING SOCIETY V RICHARD PAMPLIN AND CO | ||
| 650 | _aMARGIN OF ERROR | ||
| 650 | _aMORTGAGE VALUATION | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aOVER-VALUATION | ||
| 650 | _aVALUERS | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND VALUATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c9356 _d9356 |
||